Infrastructure & Zoning Committee
December 17, 2012 - 10:00 AM
SD State University Extension Regional Center, Mitchell, SD
Members Present
|
Members Absent
|
Katie Konda, SDDA
|
Dusty Anderson
|
Ty Eschenbaum, SDDA
|
Steve Rommereim
|
David Skaggs, SDDA
|
Bob Wilcox
|
Todd Kayes
|
Bob Thaler
|
Mitch Fargen
| |
Steve Pohl
| |
Paul Brandt
| |
Cory Eich
| |
Karl Jensen
| |
Lester Mueller
|
The meeting began by each committee member introducing themselves and explaining their backgrounds and experience. After explaining the purpose, intent, and overall goals of this meeting, the agenda was accomplished in three main steps:
First: The committee discussed in roundtable fashion the Positives & the Challenges regarding the infrastructure and zoning issues facing our state as a whole. During this brainstorming session, all of these identified items were listed as either a POSITIVE or a CHALLENGE.
Positives
|
Challenges
|
Strong agriculture community
|
Some zoning ordinances are restrictive in nature (not see as ‘guiding’ progress)
|
Clear/concise regulations are a net positive for county and all involved
|
Some zoning ordinances need updating
|
Some townships have used haul agreements
|
Townships don’t receive funds for infrastructure
|
New operations are building to high environmental standards
|
Infrastructure in townships can’t handle the large loads
|
Some counties (i.e. Minnehaha) have used agricultural easements
|
Inconsistency in applying zoning ordinances & permits
|
Discretion allows for subjectivity
| |
Some counties don’t follow formalized meeting processes (i.e. Robert’s Rules, structured meetings, etc.)
| |
Bad actors are hard to account for
| |
Clear Communication & Education
|
Second: The committee viewed these Positives & Challenges lists and used them to formulate Ideas as listed below. These ideas were all listed without throwing any out.
Ideas
|
Educate regarding zoning, public & county commission/zoning, planning boards
-SDSU Extension has training opportunities
-Dept. of Environment & Natural Resources
-SD Dept. of Ag
-SD Association of County Commissioners
|
List of pre-certified/ “ag friendly” sites in counties
|
Get funding to townships/State
|
List of Resources for counties who want to update zoning
-Template for zoning with customization
-Agricultural easement/CAFO easement for new properties: housing
|
Example of process/procedure for counties when dealing with permits
-Categories in decision making process
-Checklists/Flowcharts
|
Use planning districts’ expertise to help counties
|
How to fund infrastructure?
|
Last: The committee used the list of potential Ideas to develop specific action steps that we identified as our Objectives. By summarizing and grouping the related Ideas into clear & concise goals, the following steps were identified:
Objectives
|
1) Define & Determine what infrastructure is essential for agricultural development
|
2) Establish funding mechanism to support necessary infrastructure
|
3) Education and Resources
|
a. Develop a standard list of available resources and contact information for involved agencies and organizations
|
b. Develop training module for interested counties
|
i. Customizable templates for decision making/flow charts
|
ii. How to run a formal meeting
|
iii. Updating comprehensive plans to include agricultural friendly policies
|
No comments:
Post a Comment